Abstract
Evaluating online discussions is a complex task for educators. Information systems may support instructors and course designers to assess the quality of an asynchronous online discussion tool. Interactivity on a human-to-human, human-to-computer or human-to-content level are focal elements of such quality assessment. Nevertheless existing indicators used to measure interactivity oftentimes rely on manual data collection. One major contribution of this paper is an updated overview about indicators which are ready for automatic data collection and processing. Following a design science research approach we introduce measures for a consumer side of interactivity and contrast them with a producer's perspective. For this purpose we contrast two ratio measures 'viewed posts prior to a statement' and 'viewed posts after a statement' created by a student. In order to evaluate these indicators, we apply them to Pinio, an innovative asynchronous video discussion tool, used in a virtual seminar. © 2014 Springer International Publishing.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rothe, H., Sundermeier, J., & Gersch, M. (2014). Analyzing interactivity in asynchronous video discussions. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8523 LNCS, pp. 226–237). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5_22
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.