Visual field advantage: Redefined by training?

17Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previc (1990) postulated that most peri-personal space interactions occurred in the lower visual field (LVF), leading to an advantage when compared to the upper visual field (UVF). It is not clear if extensive practice can affect the difference between interactions in the LVF/UVF. We tested male and female basketball varsity athletes and non-athletes on a DynaVision D2 visuomotor reaction task. We recruited basketball players because in their training they spend significant amount of time processing UVF information. We found a LVF advantage in all participants, but this advantage was significantly reduced in the athletes. The results suggest that training can be a powerful modulator of visuomotor function.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stone, S. A., Baker, J., Olsen, R., Gibb, R., Doan, J., Hoetmer, J., & Gonzalez, C. L. R. (2019). Visual field advantage: Redefined by training? Frontiers in Psychology, 9(JAN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02764

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free