A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS APPROACHES FOR PHYTOPARASITIC NEMATODE IDENTIFICATION

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Phytoparasitic nematode is a microscopic worm that affects the host plants and causes severe losses in the agricultural sector. Accurate and rapid identification of phytoparasitic nematodes is required to determine proper pest control and management. Hence it has become a necessity to automate the phytoparasitic nematode identification procedure. This study conducts a comparative analysis of 15 popular convolutional neural networks models, namely CoAtNet-0, DenseNet121, DenseNet169, DenseNet201, EfficientNetV2B0, EfficientNetV2B3, EfficientNetV2L, EfficientNetV2M, EfficientNetV2S, InceptionResNetV2, InceptionV3, ResNet101v2, ResNet50v2, VGG19, and Xception to deals with phytoparasitic nematode identification from the microscopic image. The results are compared using several evaluation metrics, namely test accuracy, mean class accuracy, F1 score, precision, and recall. The results show that CoAtNet-0 outperformed other models with 98.06% test accuracy, 97.86% mean class accuracy, 0.9803 F1 score, 0.9818 Precision, and 0.9806 Recall.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shabrina, N. H., Indarti, S., Lika, R. A., & Maharani, R. (2023). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS APPROACHES FOR PHYTOPARASITIC NEMATODE IDENTIFICATION. Communications in Mathematical Biology and Neuroscience, 2023. https://doi.org/10.28919/cmbn/7993

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free