Retractions from altmetric and bibliometric perspectives

17Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the battle for better science, the research community must obliterate, at times, works from the publication record, a process known as retraction. Additionally, publications and papers accumulate an altmetric attention score, which is a complementary metric to citation-based metrics. We used the citations, Journal Impact Factor, time between publication and retraction and the reasons behind retraction in order to find determinants of the retracted paperś altmetric attention score. To find these determinants we compared two samples, one of retractions with top altmetric attention scores and one of retractions with altmetric attention scores chosen at random. We used a binary choice model to estimate the probability of being retracted due to misconduct or error. The model shows positive effects of altmetric scores and the time between publication and retraction on the probability to be retracted due to misconduct in the top sample. We conclude that there is an association between retraction due to misconduct and higher altmetric attention scores within the top sample.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shema, H., Hahn, O., Mazarakis, A., & Peters, I. (2019). Retractions from altmetric and bibliometric perspectives. Information-Wissenschaft Und Praxis, 70(2–3), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2019-2006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free