Trends of reporting of 'serious'vs. 'non-serious' adverse drug reactions over time: A study in the French PharmacoVigilance Database

42Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim To investigate trends in spontaneous reporting to the French Pharmacovigilance system of 'serious' (SADRs) and 'non-serious' (NSADRs) adverse drug reactions over time. Methods Annual SADR:NSADR ratios were calculated for each drug and their evolution tested with linear trend tests. Results Among the 39 new active substances commercialized in France in 2000, 16 had sufficient data to perform linear trend tests. An increasing linear relation was found for five widely prescribed drugs, a non-significant increasing trend for eight others, i.e. drugs mostly used in hospitals. Conclusion ADR reports mainly concern NSADRs during first years of marketing. Reports of SADRs are proportionally more frequent later. © 2012 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moulis, G., Sommet, A., Durrieu, G., Bagheri, H., Lapeyre-Mestre, M., & Montastruc, J. L. (2012). Trends of reporting of ’serious’vs. “non-serious” adverse drug reactions over time: A study in the French PharmacoVigilance Database. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 74(1), 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04185.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free