Consistency between two subjective assessments of activities of daily living: Patient- and occupational therapist-reported judgments

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the consistency between patient- and occupational therapist-reported judgments of patients’ ability and change in ADL abilities. Materials: Patient- and therapist-reported ADL abilities were assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale, whilst the changes in patients’ ADL abilities were reported by patients and therapists using a 15-point Likert-type scale. Methods: Repeated assessments at a 3-week interval were used. 88 inpatients with stroke and 16 occupational therapists were recruited from rehabilitation wards in a medical center. Results: Moderate correlations (rs =.53–.56) were found between the patient- and therapist-reported ADL abilities. The patient-reported scores were significantly lower (ds =.45; ps

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lien, H. P., Wang, Y. C., Chen, Y. M., Fan, S. C., Chen, M. H., Chiang, H. Y., & Hsieh, C. L. (2023). Consistency between two subjective assessments of activities of daily living: Patient- and occupational therapist-reported judgments. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36(2), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/15691861231198710

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free