Evaluation of thyroid nodules in the brazilian public health care system, supplementary health system, and private health system in the northeastern region of the state of São Paulo

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To obtain data about the evaluation of thyroid nodules (TNs) in the northeastern of the State of São Paulo, compared by health care type, and measure the performance of cytology as a screening test for thyroid cancer (TC). Subjects and methods: We collected data of 597 patients treated in the Brazilian public health care system (SUS), supplementary health (SH) and in private health system (PHS) in 2014. A total of 803 TNs were aspirated, and 125 patients underwent surgery. Results: The distribution of all cytologic results according to the Bethesda system was: I, 135 (16.8%); II, 475 (59.2%); III, 107 (13.3%); IV, 32 (4.0%); V, 20 (2.5%); VI, 34 (4.2%). The time between cytologic analysis and surgery was longer in the SUS than in the SH for TNs in general (p < 0.001) and for TNs with Bethesda V and VI cytology (p = 0.01). The sizes of the TNs and resected malignant TNs was larger in the SUS than in the SH (p = 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively). The number of PHS surgeries was too small and was not compared. The prevalence of TC was 9.2% and 23.6% of them were treated in the SUS. Cytology showed a 93.6% sensitivity, 95.8% specificity, and 94.7% accuracy when Bethesda III and IV were excluded. Conclusion: Cytology was a good screening test forTC categories Bethesda II, V, and VI. The differences between the SUS and SH indicate a need for improved access to consultations and specialized tests in the SUS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goulart, A. P. F. E., Batista, E. R. M., Figueira, M. G., Magalhães, P. K. R., & Maciel, L. M. Z. (2020). Evaluation of thyroid nodules in the brazilian public health care system, supplementary health system, and private health system in the northeastern region of the state of São Paulo. Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 64(6), 779–786. https://doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000294

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free