A study to compare task-based mirror therapy versus constraint induced movement therapy for hand function in hemiplegic subjects

5Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction and Aim: To find the effectiveness of task-based mirror therapy when compared with constraint-induced movement therapy for hand function in hemiplegic subjects. Stroke is a major health problem in the world. According to various researches, 70%-80% of the patients have the upper extremity impairment then lower extremity. Task-based mirror therapy can be an effective management for premotor cortex impairment. Constraint-induced movement therapy forms the new neural pathway when used properly. Materials and Methods: 30 patients with subacute CVA (cerebrovascular attack) were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and task-based mirror therapy (TMBT). The full-Meyer motor function assessment was evaluated 4 weeks after treatment. Results: The results showed that mean value of TMBT (pre-test – 5.733, post-test-9.86) and SD of (pre-test-1.67, post-test-1.92) and in CIMT (pre-test-6.3, post-test-11.13) and SD (Pre-test-1.45, Post-test-1.36). Conclusion: This study shows that CIMT group showed more improvement than TMBT group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Preetha, K., Vimala, U., & Kamalakannan, M. (2021). A study to compare task-based mirror therapy versus constraint induced movement therapy for hand function in hemiplegic subjects. Biomedicine (India), 41(3), 665–668. https://doi.org/10.51248/.v41i3.1204

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free