Choice of New Oral Anticoagulant Agents Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation

17Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Many patients with AF receive chronic anticoagulation, either with Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or with non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). We sought to analyze variables associated with prescription of NOAC. Methods: Patients with AF under anticoagulation treatment were prospectively recruited in this observational registry. The sample comprised 1290 patients under chronic anticoagulation for AF, 994 received VKA (77.1%) and 296 NOAC (22.9%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with use of NOAC. Results: Mean age was 73.8 ± 9.4 years, and 42.5% of the patients were women. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was 0 in 4.9% of the population, 1 in 24.1%, and ≥2 in 71% (median = 4, interquartile range = 2). Variables associated with NOAC treatment were major bleeding (odds ratio [OR] = 3.36; confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.73-6.51; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moreno-Arribas, J., Bertomeu-González, V., Anguita-Sanchez, M., Cequier, Á., Muñiz, J., Castillo, J., … Bertomeu-Martínez, V. (2016). Choice of New Oral Anticoagulant Agents Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 21(2), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074248415596426

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free