Modulation of essential (n-6):(n-3) fatty acid ratios alters fatty acid status but not bone mass in piglets

59Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Dietary (n-6) and (n-3) fatty acids have been implicated as important regulators of bone metabolism. The main objective of this research was to define the response of whole-body growth, fatty acid status and bone mass to a reduced dietary (n-6):(n-3) fatty acid ratio. A secondary objective was to determine whether there is an amount of fat × fatty acid ratio interaction for these outcomes. Piglets (n = 32) were randomized to 1 of 4 diets: group 1: [30 g fat/L + (n-6):(n-3) ratio 4.5:1]; group 2: [30 g fat/L + (n-6):(n-3) ratio 9.0:1]; group 3: [60 g fat/L + (n-6):(n-3) ratio 4.5:1]; and group 4: [60 g fat/L + (n-6):(n-3) ratio 9.0:1]. After 21 d, outcomes assessed included growth, fatty acid status and bone mass and metabolism. Growth and bone mass did not differ among the four groups nor did arachidonic acid (AA as g/100 g fatty acids) in plasma, adipose and brain. Piglets fed diets 1 and 3 with the lower (n-6):(n-3) ratio had lower liver AA (P < 0.001). Those fed diets 1 and 2 containing 30 g fat/L had lower docosahexaenoic acid (DHA as g/100 g fatty acids) in liver (P < 0.001), plasma (P = 0.019) and adipose tissue (P = 0.045). However, piglets fed diets 1 and 3 had higher (P < 0.001) brain DHA than those fed diets with a higher (n-6):(n-3) ratio. Higher plasma DHA was associated with less bone resorption (r = -0.44, P = 0.01). Therefore, elevation of dietary (n-3) fatty acids supports growth and fatty acid status while not compromising bone mass. The results may be of relevance to the nutritional management of preterm infants whose DHA status is often too low and bone resorption too high.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weiler, H. A., & Fitzpatrick-Wong, S. C. (2002). Modulation of essential (n-6):(n-3) fatty acid ratios alters fatty acid status but not bone mass in piglets. Journal of Nutrition, 132(9), 2667–2672. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.9.2667

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free