A comparative biomechanical study of original and compatible titanium bases: Evaluation of screw loosening and 3D-crown displacement following cyclic loading analysis

5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study evaluated screw loosening and 3D crown displacement after cyclic loading of implant-supported incisor crowns cemented with original titanium bases or with three compatible, nonoriginal components. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 32 dental implants were divided into four groups (n = 8 each): Group 1 used original titanium bases, while Groups 2-4 used compatible components. The reverse torque value (RTV) was evaluated prior to and after cyclic loading (1,200,000 cycles). Samples (prior to and after cyclic loading) were scanned with a microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). Preload and postload files were superimposed by 3D inspection software, and 3D crown displacement analysis was performed using root-mean-square (RMS) values. All datasets were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc analysis. RESULTS. Significant variations were observed in the postload RTV, depending on the titanium base brand (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ožiūnas, R., Sakalauskienė, J., Jegelevičius, D., & Janužis, G. (2022). A comparative biomechanical study of original and compatible titanium bases: Evaluation of screw loosening and 3D-crown displacement following cyclic loading analysis. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 14(3), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.70

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free