Abstract
Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been widely used in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathies. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the diagnostic value of EBUS-TBNA in mediastinal tuberculous lymphadenopathy (TBLA). Material/Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Sinoced were systematically searched for articles published in English or Chinese that reported the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA in mediastinal TBLA. The quality of studies was assessed using the QualSyst tool. Using 95% confdence intervals (CI), the diagnostic yields of EBUS-TBNA were calculated for the individual studies, and the results were then pooled using a random-efects model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. Results: A total of 14 studies, consisting of 684 patients with mediastinal TBLA, were fnally included. The pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal TBLA was 80% (95% CI: 74–86%). Signifcant heterogeneity (I2=77.9%) and signifcant publication bias were detected (Begg’s test p=0.05 and Egger’s test p=0.02). From subgroup analyses, signifcant diferences in the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA were associated with Asian vs. European (UK) studies, retrospective vs. prospective studies, those employing rapid on-site cytological evaluation vs. not, those employing diferent anesthetic types, and those employing smear vs. culture. However, microbiological examination and the number of lymph node passes did not have a signifcant efect on the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA. Fifteen minor complications for EBUS-TBNA were reported. Conclusions: EBUS-TBNA appears to be an efcacious and safe procedure and should be used as an initial diagnostic tool for mediastinal TBLA.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Li, W., Zhang, T., Chen, Y., Liu, C., & Peng, W. (2015). Diagnostic value of convex probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in mediastinal tuberculous lymphadenitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Science Monitor, 21, 2064–2072. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.894526
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.