Overshoot phenomenon of oxygen uptake during recovery from maximal exercise in patients with previous myocardial infarction

1Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The overshoot in oxygen uptake ( V̇ O2 overshoot) during recovery from maximal exercise is thought to reflect an overshoot in cardiac output. We investigated whether this phenomenon is related to cardiopulmonary function during exercise in cardiac patients. A total of 201 consecutive patients with previous myocardial infarction underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX). An apparent V̇ O2 overshoot during the recovery from CPX (6.5 ± 8.1% increase relative to the peak V̇ O2) was observed in ten patients. A comparison of patients with the V̇ O 2 overshoot to those without the V̇ O2 overshoot revealed that the former had a significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (40.1 ± 19.1 vs. 55. 2 ± 14.9%, respectively, p = 0.002) and larger left ventricular diastolic and systolic dimensions. Patients with the V̇ O2 overshoot also had a significantly lower peak V̇ O2 (13.1 ± 6.1 vs. 18.1 ± 4.5 ml/min/kg, p < 0.001), lower Δ V̇ O2/ΔWR (work rate) (6.6 ± 3.8 vs. 9.5 ± 1.7 mL/min/W, p < 0.0001), and a higher V̇ E (minute ventilation)/ V̇ CO2 (carbon dioxide output) slope (45.0 ± 18.6 vs. 32.6 ± 6.6, p < 0.0001) than those without the overshoot. A V̇ O2 overshoot during recovery from maximal exercise was found in 5% of patients with previous myocardial infarction. This condition, which suggests a transient mismatch between cardiac contractility and afterload reduction, was found to be related to impaired cardiopulmonary function during exercise. © 2009 The Physiological Society of Japan and Springer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nagayama, O., Koike, A., Suzuki, T., Hoshimoto-Iwamoto, M., Sawada, H., & Aizawa, T. (2010). Overshoot phenomenon of oxygen uptake during recovery from maximal exercise in patients with previous myocardial infarction. Journal of Physiological Sciences, 60(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12576-009-0077-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free