On the usage of different work analysis methods for collaborative review of large scale 3D CAD models

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Human work interaction design is an emerging discipline that aims to encourage empirical studies and conceptualizations of the interaction among humans, their variegated social contexts and the technology they use both within and across these contexts. In this paper we describe and elaborate around the usage of different work analysis methods in a complex, real world work domain: collaborative review of large-scale 3D engineering models. The analysis is based on (i) input from experts in the oil platform engineering field, (ii) previous and related work and (iii) application of different methods considering the recent advances in technology. We conclude that hierarchical task analysis was not effective in obtaining a clear, common vision about the work domain. Storyboarding was the most useful technique as it allowed discovering novelty factors that differentiate the solution and improve the usability of the product, thereby supporting the human work at offshore engineering design and review sessions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Campos, P., & Noronha, H. (2013). On the usage of different work analysis methods for collaborative review of large scale 3D CAD models. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 407, pp. 12–21). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41145-8_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free