HOW DO DIFFERENT FORMS OF DIGITALIZATION AFFECT INCOME INEQUALITY?

6Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article examines how different forms of digitalization affect inequality in Europe. Using a cross-national dataset of economic development and digitalization across a range of regression specifications including country and time fixed effects, this article explores the heterogeneous relationships of disparate forms of digitalization – human capital, broadband connectivity, integration of digital technology into small and medium enterprises, and digital public services – with income inequality. Fixed country and time effects models show that only the digitalization of human capital and integration of digital technology by SMEs are associated with decreases in income inequality. Causal mediation analysis reveals that tertiary education, despite its oft-cited connection to digital technology uptake, has no causal effect on the pathways through which digitalization of labour and SME operations lower inequality, which are direct. The findings tentatively suggest that there exist informal sources of digital skills training apart from formal tertiary education and point to SMEs as a potentially impactful area for investing in digitalization as pathways for income redistribution.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Au, A. (2024). HOW DO DIFFERENT FORMS OF DIGITALIZATION AFFECT INCOME INEQUALITY? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(3), 667–687. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.20562

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free