It matters how we do it: A review of best practices of Observed Structured Clinical Examination in pharmacy education

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Since the introduction of the Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in medical education more than four decades ago, OSCEs have been adopted by a majority of healthcare professional education programmes, including pharmacy. This article aims to review the best practices as well as explore novel approaches to the use of OSCE in pharmacy education. Method: As with any assessment method, the development of OSCE stations starts with blueprinting. Personnel involved in the OSCE are briefed and adequately trained, based on their expertise and prior experience to ensure the efficient running of the OSCE as well as help maintain the reliability and validity of the assessment process. Conclusion: The OSCE assesses a range of clinical and communication skills, yet it is resource-intensive and requires extensive planning. However, it must be considered an important and essential means to develop and assess the skills required by the pharmacy graduates for safe future practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheema, E., & Ali, M. (2021). It matters how we do it: A review of best practices of Observed Structured Clinical Examination in pharmacy education. Pharmacy Education. International Pharmaceutical Federation. https://doi.org/10.46542/PE.2021.211.283291

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free