Vindesine-mitoxantrone (VM) versus vindesine-4'-Epidoxorubicin (VE) in metastatic breast cancer: A prospective randomized trial

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

182 patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to V (mg/ m 2 i.v.) and M (10 mg/m 2 i.v.) or E (40 mg/m 2 i.v.) every 3 weeks x 3 and then every 4 weeks; they were stratified by sites of disease (visceral, bone, or soft-tissue dominant) and by prior chemotherapy. In a preliminary analysis there is a significant difference regarding frequency of alopecia (WHO Grade 3 or 4) favoring regimen VM: Gastrointestinal, hematologic and neurotoxic side effects were mild and similar for both groups. Of 114 evaluable women there is a response rate (CR + PR) of 26% and 34% for VM and VE respectively (n.s.), and there is no significant difference between the 2 groups in time to progression and survival. Both regimens are well tolerated and seem to be equally effective. The median follow-up time is too short to draw final conclusions. © 1988 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hausmaninger, H., & Lehnert, M. (1988). Vindesine-mitoxantrone (VM) versus vindesine-4’-Epidoxorubicin (VE) in metastatic breast cancer: A prospective randomized trial. Oncology Research and Treatment, 11(1), 59–60. https://doi.org/10.1159/000216485

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free