Non-Traditional Trademarks and Inherently Valuable Expression

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Trademark laws currently allow companies to obtain trademark rights in product configurations, colors, scents, sounds, flavors, textures, and other “non-traditional” marks that identify and distinguish the source of goods or services. This chapter argues that non-traditional trademarks convey expression protected by the right to freedom of expression in constitutions, human rights treaties, and statutes. Not only do distinctive non-traditional marks communicate source-identifying information, but these product attributes may also intrinsically convey information, ideas, or other messages unrelated to the trademark owner. Therefore trademark laws regulating this expression must have a sufficient justification, and governments should repeal or revise laws protecting non-traditional marks when they do not directly further trademark law’s goals and harm free expression. Nations should refuse to register non-traditional marks that expressed inherently valuable messages unrelated to source-identification before they were adopted or used as marks, or only grant such marks narrow protection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramsey, L. P. (2019). Non-Traditional Trademarks and Inherently Valuable Expression. In The Protection of Non-Traditional Trademarks: Critical Perspectives (pp. 337–361). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826576.003.0018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free