Risk factors for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a case-control study

  • Naveda Romero O
  • Naveda Meléndez A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an important cause of acute respiratory failure, is associated with a significant risk of mortality; despite current progress in mechanical ventilation and protective lung ventilation. Determine risk factors for the development of ARDS in children with more than 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. Objective: Determine risk factors for the development of ARDS in children with more than 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. Materials and Methods: Was designed a case-control study, where were compared 61 children with ARDS with 183 controls without ARDS with age between 1 month and 15 years. A logistic regression model was created to evaluate the effect on the risk. Results: In univariate analysis, the factors associated with ARDS were: PELOD score, pulmonary contusion, multiple trauma, shock, red blood cell transfusion, fluid overload, PaO2/FiO(2) ratio, oxygenation index, PEEP and 2 2pH. Through binary logistic regression was identified as predictors for the development of ARDS: More than 3 red blood cell transfusions (OR: 1.5; 95% CI 1.2 -1.9, p = 0.010), fluid overload (OR: 1.3; 95% CI 1.1 -5.7, p = 0.012) and oxygenation index more than 8 without other criteria for ARDS (OR: 1.9; 95% CI 1.4 -2.6, p < 0.0001). Mortality was higher in the group with ARDS (37.7% vs. 6.0%, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: More than 3 red blood cell transfusions, fluid overload and oxygenation index more than 8 are risk factors for the development of ARDS. Early recognition of risk factors of ARDS could help decrease its development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naveda Romero, O. E., & Naveda Meléndez, A. F. (2016). Risk factors for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a case-control study. Pediatría (Asunción), 43(3), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.18004/ped.2016.diciembre.225-231

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free