Double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover, multicentre study to determine the efficacy of a 0.1% (w/v) sodium hyaluronate solution (Fermavisc) in the treatment of dry eye syndrome

79Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/aims - Hyaluronan (sodium hyaluronate) has been shown to confer objective and subjective improvement in patients with dry eye syndrome. This study compared the efficacy and safety of a 0.1% solution of hyaluronan with 0.9% saline, when administered topically to the eye, in the treatment of symptoms of severe dry eye syndrome. Methods - A randomised, double blind, crossover clinical trial in which subjects were randomised to receive either hyaluronan or saline, applied as one or two drops to the eye, three or four times a day or as required. After 28 days' treatment, subjects crossed over to the other study medication for a further 28 days' treatment. Results - 70 subjects were included in the analyses of efficacy and significant improvements in Schirmer's score (p = 0.0006) and rose bengal staining score (p = 0.0001) were observed during treatment with hyaluronan. In a subjective assessment of the effectiveness of two treatments, a majority of subjects felt that hyaluronan was more effective than saline in alleviating the symptoms of burning and grittiness (p < 0.001). No adverse events attributable to hyaluronan treatment were reported. Conclusion - The study demonstrates a clear benefit of hyaluronan over saline, in both subjective and objective assessments of dry eye syndrome. Hyaluronan was shown to be well tolerated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Condon, P. I., McEwen, C. G., Wright, M., Mackintosh, G., Prescott, R. J., & McDonald, C. (1999). Double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover, multicentre study to determine the efficacy of a 0.1% (w/v) sodium hyaluronate solution (Fermavisc) in the treatment of dry eye syndrome. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 83(10), 1121–1124. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.83.10.1121

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free