A manifesto for messy philosophy of technology: The history and future of an academic field

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Philosophy of technology was not initially considered a consolidated field of inquiry. However, under the influence of sociology and pragmatist philosophy, something resembling a con-sensus has emerged in a field previously marked by a lack of agreement amongst its practitioners. This has given the field a greater sense of structure and yielded interesting research. However, the loss of the earlier “messy” state has resulted in a limitation of the field’s scope and methodology that precludes an encom-passing view of the problematic issues inherent in the question of technology. It is argued that the heterodox disunity and diversity of earlier philosophy of technology was not a mark of theoretical immaturity but was necessitated by the field’s complex subject matter. It is fur-ther argued that philosophy of technology should return to its pluralistic role as a meta-analytical structure linking insights from different fields of research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toit, J. D., & Swer, G. M. (2020). A manifesto for messy philosophy of technology: The history and future of an academic field. Teorie Vedy / Theory of Science, 42(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2020.491

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free