Abstract
Philosophy of technology was not initially considered a consolidated field of inquiry. However, under the influence of sociology and pragmatist philosophy, something resembling a con-sensus has emerged in a field previously marked by a lack of agreement amongst its practitioners. This has given the field a greater sense of structure and yielded interesting research. However, the loss of the earlier “messy” state has resulted in a limitation of the field’s scope and methodology that precludes an encom-passing view of the problematic issues inherent in the question of technology. It is argued that the heterodox disunity and diversity of earlier philosophy of technology was not a mark of theoretical immaturity but was necessitated by the field’s complex subject matter. It is fur-ther argued that philosophy of technology should return to its pluralistic role as a meta-analytical structure linking insights from different fields of research.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Toit, J. D., & Swer, G. M. (2020). A manifesto for messy philosophy of technology: The history and future of an academic field. Teorie Vedy / Theory of Science, 42(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2020.491
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.