Development and validation of the Reality-Monitoring Error Experience Questionnaire

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study developed a valid and reliable questionnaire measuring individual differences in reality-monitoring error experiences in everyday life. A 50-item preliminary questionnaire was constructed on the basis of the findings from a pilot diary study. In study 1, we administered the questionnaire to 316 undergraduates, along with a dissociative experience scale to examine criterion-referenced validity. Using factor analysis, we obtained the 32-item Reality-Monitoring Error Experience Questionnaire (RMEEQ). A significant positive correlation was found between scores on the RMEEQ and the dissociative experience scale, thereby which indicates the RMEEQ's criterion-referenced validity. In Study 2, we examined the test-retest reliability of the RMEEQ by administering it to 66 undergraduates on two occasions separated by three weeks. We found a significant test-retest correlation. Taken together, these results show that the RMEEQ is a valid and reliable measure of reality-monitoring error experiences in everyday life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nakata, E., & Morita, T. (2014). Development and validation of the Reality-Monitoring Error Experience Questionnaire. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 85(2), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.85.12218

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free