Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for cervical deformity patients

13Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To prioritize the cervical parameter targets for alignment. Methods: Included: cervical deformity (CD) patients (C2-7 Cobb angle>10°, cervical lordosis> 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA]>4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle>25°) with full baseline (BL) and 1-year (1Y) radiographic parameters and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores; patients with cervical [C] or cervicothoracic [CT] Primary Driver Ames type. Patients with BL Ames classified as low CD for both parameters of cSVA (<4 cm) and T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (TS-CL) (<15°) were excluded. Patients assessed: meeting minimum clinically important differences (MCID) for NDI ( 0.050). Decision tree analysis determined cutoffs for radiographic change, prioritizing in the following order: =42.5° C2-T3 angle, >35.4° cervical lordosis, -30.8-mm C2-T3 SVA, and =-33.6° TS-CL. Conclusion: Certain ratios of correction of cervical parameters contribute to improving neck disability. Prioritizing these radiographic alignment parameters may help optimize patient- reported outcomes for patients undergoing CD surgery.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pierce, K. E., Passias, P. G., Brown, A. E., Bortz, C. A., Alas, H., Passfall, L., … Ames, C. (2021). Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for cervical deformity patients. Neurospine, 18(3), 506–514. https://doi.org/10.14245/NS.2040540.270

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free