Most historical critics consider the story in Genesis 34 to be composed of two sources which differ considerably from the redactional unity in which they now stand. In this study a critique is offered of the arguments given for such an analysis of the chapter and it is argued that we ought to consider the story always to have existed as a unity.
CITATION STYLE
Parry, R. (2000). Source Criticism & Genesis 34. Tyndale Bulletin, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.53751/001c.30284
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.