Source Criticism & Genesis 34

  • Parry R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Most historical critics consider the story in Genesis 34 to be composed of two sources which differ considerably from the redactional unity in which they now stand. In this study a critique is offered of the arguments given for such an analysis of the chapter and it is argued that we ought to consider the story always to have existed as a unity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parry, R. (2000). Source Criticism & Genesis 34. Tyndale Bulletin, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.53751/001c.30284

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free