The epidemiology of hepatitis A in Rio de Janeiro: Environmental and domestic risk factors

33Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A serological study of hepatitis A was carried out in low-income areas scheduled for a major sanitation programme in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Blood spots were collected by finger puncture and transported on filter paper, and total antibodies to hepatitis A virus were detected by ELISA. Households were also interviewed to collect information on their environmental conditions and socio-economic status. A generalized linear model using a complementary log-log function was fitted to the data, using the logarithm of age as an explanatory variable to derive adjusted rate ratios (RR). The risk of infection was greater among households with 2-3 members per room (RR = 1·4; 95% CI = 1·04-1·8) or more than three per room (RR = 1·5; 95% CI = 1·2-2·0). People living on hilltops (RR = 1·5; 95% CI = 1·02-2·2), near to open sewers (RR = 1·2; 95% CI = 1·03-1·5) or lacking a kitchen (RR = 1·4; 95% CI = 1·08-1·9) were also at greater risk than others. The number of taps and water-using fittings in the house was associated with a protective effect (RR = 0·9 for each tap; 95% CI = 0·9-0·98). A significant protective association was found with maternal education but not with gender or household income. The results do not suggest a strong association with water quality. Ownership of a ceramic water filter was associated with a protective effect on the margin of significance, but the practice of boiling drinking-water was not, nor was the type of water source used. The results suggest that that the risk of infection with hepatitis A is determined by environmental variables in the domestic and public domains.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Almeida, L. M., Werneck, G. L., Cairncross, S., Coeli, C. M., Costa, M. C. E., & Coletty, P. E. (2001). The epidemiology of hepatitis A in Rio de Janeiro: Environmental and domestic risk factors. Epidemiology and Infection, 127(2), 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268801005945

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free