The impossible machine: A genealogy of South Africa’s truth and reconciliation commission

76Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Adam Sitze meticulously traces the origins of South Africa�s Truth and Reconciliation Commission back to two well-established instruments of colonial and imperial governance: the jurisprudence of indemnity and the commission of inquiry. This genealogy provides a fresh, though counterintuitive, understanding of the TRC�s legal, political, and cultural importance. The TRC�s genius, Sitze contends, is not the substitution of “forgiving” restorative justice for “strict” legal justice but rather the innovative adaptation of colonial law, sovereignty, and government. However, this also contains a potential liability: if the TRC�s origins are forgotten, the very enterprise intended to overturn the jurisprudence of colonial rule may perpetuate it. In sum, Sitze proposes a provocative new means by which South Africa�s Truth and Reconciliation Commission should be understood and evaluated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sitze, A. (2013). The impossible machine: A genealogy of South Africa’s truth and reconciliation commission. The Impossible Machine: A Genealogy of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (pp. 1–380). University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/17533171.2014.984913

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free