Abstract
The Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI), widely used to assess wildfire danger, typically relies on noon-specific meteorological data. However, climate models often provide only daily aggregated values, posing a challenge for accurate FWI calculations. We evaluated daily approximations for FWI95d—the annual count of extreme fire-weather days—against the standard noon-based method (1980–2023). Our findings reveal that noon-based FWI95d show a global increase of ~65% (11.66 days over 44 years). In contrast, daily approximations tend to overestimate these trends by 5–10%, with combinations involving minimum relative humidity showing the largest divergences. Globally, up to 15 million km²—particularly in the western United States, southern Africa, and parts of Asia—exhibit significant overestimations. We recommend (i) prioritizing the inclusion of sub-daily meteorological data in future climate model intercomparison projects to enhance FWI accuracy, and (ii) adopting daily mean approximations as the least-biased alternative if noon-specific data are unavailable.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Matteo, A., Garnés-Morales, G., Moreno, A., Ribeiro, A. F. S., Azorin-Molina, C., Bedia, J., … Turco, M. (2025). Challenges in assessing Fire Weather changes in a warming climate. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01163-0
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.