Procedural predictors and outcomes of percutaneous secundum atrial septal defect closure in children aged <6 years

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) closure is the treatment of choice for patients with a suitable ASD anatomy; however, the procedural characteristics and outcomes in children aged <6 years are unclear. The feasibility and safety of percutaneous ASD closure in children aged <6 years was evaluated and the predictors of procedural failure and challenging cases were identified. Methods and Results: Patients from a single center between 2006 and 2018 (n=407) were retrospectively evaluated. There were 265 (65.1%) female patients. The median age at the time of the procedure and ASD size were 3.4 (0.9–5.9) years and 13.3 (3.8–27.0) mm, respectively. Medical records and echocardiographic images were analyzed. A challenging case was indicated by the use of non-conventional techniques. The procedure was completed in 399 patients (98.0%). Post-procedural acute complications occurred in 5 patients, including 1 with device embolization. Two patients underwent surgical device removal. During the follow up (30.3 [3.6–140.8] months), aggravated mitral regurgitation occurred in 5 patients. A multivariate logistic regression revealed large-sized ASD as a predictor of procedural failure (odds ratio=1.828, 95% confidence interval: 1.139–2.934, P=0.012) and challenging cases (odds ratio=1.371, 95% confidence interval: 1.180–1.593, P<0.001). Conclusions: Percutaneous ASD closure is feasible and safe in children aged <6 years; however, patients with large-sized ASD are at high risk of procedural failure and becoming a challenging case.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cha, S. G., Kim, M. J., Baek, J. S., Yu, J. J., & Kim, Y. H. (2021). Procedural predictors and outcomes of percutaneous secundum atrial septal defect closure in children aged <6 years. Circulation Journal, 85(9), 1527–1534. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-20-1023

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free