Isonomia, demokratia, and enaction in Herodotus

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Following the path of Popova’s (2015) enactive approach to narrative, this inquiry focuses on two clusters of metaphors around which Herodotus organized his perceptions about isonomia and demokratia: the cognitive and the pragmatic. In-stead of highlighting differences between isonomia and demokratia, we wish to evince cumulative in-teractions between both concepts, a process that allows us to make sense of one — demokratia — through the other — isonomia. This approach is also helpful to transpose ancient meditations upon democracy to contemporary contexts not because ancient and contemporary democracies look sim-ilar, but because those meditations are constituent parts of the democracy-metaphors we currently live by, and whose roots one can see in the attributes Herodotus ascribed to it in III 80-82 and V 66-73.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sebastiani, B. B., & Leão, D. F. (2020). Isonomia, demokratia, and enaction in Herodotus. Emerita, Revista de Linguistica y Filologia Clasica, 88(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2020.03.1943

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free