Physiological growth of ocular axial length among Chinese children and teenagers: A 6-year cohort study

10Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To investigate the pattern and threshold of physiological growth, defining as axial length (AL) elongation that results in little refraction progression, among Chinese children and teenagers, a total of 916 children aged between 7 and 18 years from a 6-year longitudinal cohort study were included for analysis. Ocular biometry, cycloplegic refraction and demographic data were obtained annually. Physiological growth was calculated based on myopic progression and Gullstrand eye model, respectively. The annual change in AL was found to be significantly smaller in the persistent emmetropia (PE) group compared to the incident myopia (IM) and persistent myopia (PM) group at all ages (all P < 0.05). In children with non-progressive myopia, there was observed axial elongation ranging from 0.17 to 0.23 mm/year between the ages of 9 and 12. This growth rate persisted at approximately 0.10 mm/year beyond the age of 12. While the compensated AL growth calculated using Gullstrand model was only 0.02 to 0.15 mm/year at age of 9–12, and decreased to around 0 mm/year after age of 12. For children aged 7–9 years, the cutoff point for AL growth to distinguish between progressive myopia and non-progressive myopia was 0.19 mm/year. These findings indicate a notable disparity between the thresholds of physiological growth calculated using myopic progression and Gullstrand eye model. This observation suggests that when formulating effective myopia control strategies, consideration should be given to different calculation methods when applying physiological AL growth as a starting point or target.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, Y., Ding, X., Xiong, R., Zhang, J., Song, F., Zhao, Z., … He, M. (2025). Physiological growth of ocular axial length among Chinese children and teenagers: A 6-year cohort study. PLoS ONE, 20(1 January). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317756

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free