Comparison of fovea-sparing and non-internal limiting membrane peeling for retinoschisis with foveal detachment in highly myopic eyes

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the visual and anatomical outcomes of two different treatment strategies (non-internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and fovea-sparing ILM peeling) for retinoschisis with foveal detachment (FD) in highly myopic eyes. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Methods: Ninety-five eyes from 92 highly myopic patients with retinoschisis with FD were divided into two groups, including 44 eyes from 43 patients who received 23-gauge, 3-port vitrectomy without ILM peeling (group A) and 51 eyes from 49 patients who received vitrectomy with fovea-sparing ILM peeling (group B). All eyes also underwent cataract surgery. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, diopters, axial length (AL), or central foveal thickness (CFT) before surgery (P > 0.05). One month after surgery, foveoschisis and FD were resolved in 74.47% of the eyes in group B and in only 12.50% of those in group A. Six months after surgery, foveoschisis and FD were resolved in 96.08% of the eyes in group B and in only 72.73% of those in group A (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of BCVA 6 months after surgery. The postoperative complication was macular holes, which were found in seven eyes (15.90%) in group A and in one eye (1.96%) in group B (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Highly myopic eyes with FD that underwent fovea-sparing ILM peeling appeared to obtain a better anatomical outcome than those that did not undergo non-ILM peeling. The two procedures obtained similar results in terms of visual function.