A Review and Comparative Analysis of Methods for Determining Criteria Weights in MCDM Tasks

  • Uzhga-Rebrov O
  • Kuļešova G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To select optimal solutions in multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) problems, many practical approaches have been developed. In almost all of these approaches, it is necessary to assess the importance of individual criteria for decision makers. Subjective assessments of importance are transformed into numerical assessments of decision weights by applying appropriate computational procedures. A large number of methods for determining the weights of the criteria have been proposed. These methods differ in their operating principles and in the calculation procedures underlying each method. The paper presents the most well-known methods and provides a brief comparative analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Uzhga-Rebrov, O., & Kuļešova, G. (2023). A Review and Comparative Analysis of Methods for Determining Criteria Weights in MCDM Tasks. Information Technology and Management Science, 26, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.7250/itms-2023-0005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free