A parapsychologist, an anthropologist, and a vitalist walk into a laboratory: Ernesto de martino, mircea eliade, and a forgotten chapter in the disciplinary history of religious studies

Abstract

While the work of the Italian historian of religion, Ernesto de Martino (1908-1965), has frequently been compared to that of Mircea Eliade, Claude Lévi-Strauss, or Clifford Geertz, he has hardly received any attention in anglophone scholarship to date. Taking an all-but-forgotten controversy between de Martino and Eliade at a conference on parapsychology in France in 1956 as its starting point, the article fills part of this lacuna by first reconstructing the philosophical universe underlying the Italian thinker’s program of study. In the process, it introduces the reader to three Weimar scientists, who have never before been inserted within the canon of the study of religion, namely the parapsychologist Albert von Schrenck-Notzing (1862-1929), the anthropologist Leo Frobenius (1873-1938), and the biologist and philosopher Hans Driesch (1867-1941). Contextualizing these thinkers within their historical context, it becomes clear that they were part of a larger scientific crisis that affected the Western world during the first half of the twentieth century. Finally, the article uncovers surprising affinities, particularly the fact that the Romanian thinker had his very own parapsychological phase during his youth.