A comparative clinical study of the failure rate of orthodontic brackets bonded with two adhesive systems: Conventional and Self-Etching Primer (SEP)

10Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: This study compared the clinical performance of orthodontic brackets bonded with Transbond adhesive paste after two priming systems: a two-stage conventional system (acid etching + Transbond XT adhesive primer) and a singlestage self-etching primer (SEP) (Transbond Plus). Methods: The sample comprised 480 metal brackets bonded to the teeth of 24 consecutive patients treated for 36 to 48 months. A split-mouth design was used for bonding, and both systems were used in each patient. Bracket failure rates for each system were analyzed; and failure causes as reported by the patients and the quadrant of teeth for which brackets failed were recorded. Results: The conventional system group had a failure rate of 5.41%, whereas the rate for SEP was 4.58%. In this group, there were 5 failures (38.4%) in the right maxillary quadrant, 2 (15.4%) in the left maxillary quadrant, 4 (30.8%) in the right mandibular quadrant, and 2 (15.4%) in the left mandibular quadrant. In the SEP group, there were 4 (36.4%) failures in the right maxillary quadrant, 1 (9%) in the left maxillary quadrant, 3 (27.3%) in the right mandibular quadrant, and 3 (27.3%) in the left mandibular quadrant. Results of descriptive statistical analysis and odds ratio did not show any significant differences between rates (p = 0.67). Conclusion: The clinical efficiency of SEP was similar to that of the conventional system. © 2013 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dominguez, G. C., Tortamano, A., Lopes, L. V. de M., Catharino, P. C. C., & Morea, C. (2013). A comparative clinical study of the failure rate of orthodontic brackets bonded with two adhesive systems: Conventional and Self-Etching Primer (SEP). Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 18(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512013000200014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free