UNIONS: The impact of systematic errors on weak-lensing peak counts

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context. The Ultraviolet Near-Infrared Optical Northern Survey (UNIONS) is an ongoing deep photometric multiband survey of the northern sky. As part of UNIONS, the Canada-France Imaging Survey (CFIS) provides r-band data, which we use to study weak-lensing peak counts for cosmological inference. Aims. We assess systematic effects for weak-lensing peak counts and their impact on cosmological parameters for the UNIONS survey. In particular, we present results on local calibration, metacalibration shear bias, baryonic feedback, the source galaxy redshift estimate, intrinsic alignment, and cluster member dilution. Methods. For each uncertainty and systematic effect, we describe our mitigation scheme and the impact on cosmological parameter constraints. We obtain constraints on cosmological parameters from Monte Carlo Markov chains using CFIS data and MassiveNuS N-body simulations as a model for peak counts statistics. Results. Depending on the calibration (local versus global, and the inclusion or not of the residual multiplicative shear bias), the mean matter density parameter, Om, can shift by up to-0.024 (-0.5?). We also see that including baryonic corrections can shift Om by +0.027 (+0.5?) with respect to the dark-matter-only simulations. Reducing the impact of the intrinsic alignment and cluster member dilution through signal-To-noise cuts leads to larger constraints. Finally, with a mean redshift uncertainty of dz = 0.03, we see that the shift in Om (+0.001, which corresponds to +0.02?) is not significant. Conclusions. This paper investigates, for the first time with UNIONS weak-lensing data and peak counts, the impact of systematic effects. The value of Om is the most impacted and can shift by up to ~ 0.03, which corresponds to 0.5? depending on the choices for each systematics. We expect constraints to become more reliable with future (larger) data catalogs, for which the current pipeline will provide a starting point. The code used to obtain the results is available on GitHub.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ayçoberry, E., Ajani, V., Guinot, A., Kilbinger, M., Pettorino, V., Farrens, S., … Hudson, M. J. (2023). UNIONS: The impact of systematic errors on weak-lensing peak counts. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 671. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243899

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free