Preoperative thrombocytosis as a prognostic factor in endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma

7Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of preoperative thrombocytosis as a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma (EC) remains uncertain and has never been examined in Saudi Arabia. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of preoperative thrombocytosis (platelet count >400 000/μL), and its prognostic significance for clinicopathological factors and survival in Saudi patients with endometrioid-type EC. DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional study from January 2010 to December 2013. SETTING: A referral tertiary healthcare institute. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent staging surgery for primary endometrioid-type EC were retrospectively analyzed for perioperative details: age, preoperative platelet count, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, endometrioid grade, recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier estimates and a Cox proportional hazards model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of preoperative thrombocytosis, DFS and OS. RESULTS: In 162 patients who met inclusion criteria, the frequency of preoperative thrombocytosis was 8.6% (n=14). Patients with advanced FIGO disease (stages III-IV) and recurrence had significantly higher mean preoperative platelet counts than patients with early FIGO disease (stages I-II) and no recurrence (P=.0080 and P=.0063, respectively). Patients with thrombocytosis had statistically significant higher rates of advanced FIGO stages III-IV disease, unfavorable grades II-III endometrioid histology and recurrence than patients with preoperative platelet counts ≤400 000/μL (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abu-Zaid, A., Alsabban, M., Abuzaid, M., Al Omar, O., Salem, H., & Al-Badawi, I. A. (2017). Preoperative thrombocytosis as a prognostic factor in endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 37(5), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2017.393

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free