Comparison of the Five Different Methods in Arterial Diameter Measurement

  • Babuccu O
  • Tekerekoglu B
  • Ozdemir H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aims: In this study, the different types of arterial diameter measurement methods were compared with each other on rat model. Methods: The study was planned in three phases. In phase 1, all subjects (n = 30) underwent high resolution B-mode ultrasound examination and external diameter of the right common carotid artery (RCCA) was measured. In phase 2, RCCA was explored. In phase 3, rats were put into three groups. Group 1 was kept at-20˚C, group 2 was embedded in 4% formaldehyde solution. In group 3, circulatory system was filled with %20 latex solution. In all groups, digital image of the RCCA was taken after the processes mentioned above. Images were assessed by Image-Pro Plus software. Results: The greatest average diameter was observed in the high resolution B-mode ultrasound (phase 1). In group 1 and 2, direct measurement of the RCCA on living animal (phase 2) gave significantly wider diameter than those obtained at phase 3 in the same groups. Direct (phase 2) and latex (phase 3) measurements were equal in group 3. Conclusions: High resolution B-mode ultrasound gives larger, probably actual diameter of the artery. Latex injection results might correspond those encountered during operation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Babuccu, O., Tekerekoglu, B., Ozdemir, H., Besir, H., & Gundogdu, S. (2011). Comparison of the Five Different Methods in Arterial Diameter Measurement. Surgical Science, 02(04), 204–208. https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2011.24045

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free