Contribution of the NEPSY-II Battery Theory of Mind subtest as a measure of central coherence

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this research is to analyze the clinical utility of the “Theory of Mind” (TM) subtest of NEPSY-II (Korkman et al., 2014). Methodology TM was applied to 244 school aged children with normal intelligence: a control group (n=194) and clinical groups (n=50): ASD-grade 1 (n= 10); procedural learning disorder (PLD, n=24); and ADHD (n=16). Results and Discussion We do a examination of the factorial structure through a exploratory (KMO=0.62 and MSA=0,54-0,75) and confirmatory (χ =22,75 p=0,504; TLI=1,04; CFI=1; RMSEA=0) analyses. The 21 items of the TM. 3 factors are obtained that explain 62% of the total variance: Theory of mind (items 1/2/7); Social stories comprehension (items 5/8/10/14) and Contextual coherence (items 9/12 / 16-21). The descriptive statistics are provided from the calculation of validity and reliability. None of the groups differ in the first two factors (U-mann-Whitney). In Contextual coherence, the PLD group and the control groups (p=,001) differed significantly of the ASD group (p=,025). The difficulties in understanding information in a quick and simultaneous way and integrating it coherently have been shown to be part of the neuropsychological profile of the PLD. Conclusión Our study provide a new correction an interpretation of the TM that evalautes Central coherence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crespo-Eguílaz, N., & Echeverría, L. G. (2020). Contribution of the NEPSY-II Battery Theory of Mind subtest as a measure of central coherence. Revista de Investigacion En Educacion, 18(3), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.35869/REINED.V18I3.3267

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free