Populism and the Strength of Freedom of Information Laws: Insights From European Countries (2000–2022)

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper investigates whether populist parties serve as a corrective to democratic deficiencies by enhancing access to information, or if they represent a threat to transparency, thereby undermining democratic accountability. The research employs a dual-method approach that combines quantitative and qualitative analyses. The quantitative analysis draws on a novel dataset measuring the strength of Freedom of Information (FOI) legislation across 11 European countries from 2000 to 2022. To deepen these findings, the study incorporates an in-depth qualitative analysis of Hungary—a country characterized by the dominant position in government of a right-wing populist party. Results reveal that the effect of populist parties on access to information is contingent upon their degree of access to government power and their ideological orientation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Di Mascio, F., Gaeta, G. L., Ippolito, M., & Spyropoulou, V. (2026). Populism and the Strength of Freedom of Information Laws: Insights From European Countries (2000–2022). Governance, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70069

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free