Multi-institutional prospective cohort study of patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with respiratory diseases

19Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: There is limited evidence for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-Targeted therapy in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with respiratory disease (R-PH). Therefore, we conducted a multicenter prospective study of patients with R-PH to examine real-world characteristics of responders by evaluating demographics, treatment backgrounds, and prognosis. Methods and Results: Among the 281 patients with R-PH included in this study, there was a treatment-naive cohort of 183 patients with normal pulmonary arterial wedge pressure and 1 of 4 major diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, interstitial pneumonia [IP], IP with connective tissue disease, or combined pulmonary fibrosis with emphysema); 43% of patients had mild ventilatory impairment (MVI), whereas 52% had a severe form of PH. 68% received PAH-Targeted therapies (mainly phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors). Among patients with MVI, those treated initially (i.e., within 2 months of the first right heart catheterization) had better survival than patients not treated initially (3-year survival 70.6% vs. 34.2%; P=0.01); there was no significant difference in survival in the group with severe ventilatory impairment (49.6% vs. 32.1%; P=0.38). Responders to PAH-Targeted therapy were more prevalent in the group with MVI. Conclusions: This first Japanese registry of R-PH showed that a high proportion of patients with MVI (PAH phenotype) had better survival if they received initial treatment with PAH-Targeted therapies. Responders were predominant in the group with MVI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tanabe, N., Kumamaru, H., Tamura, Y., Taniguchi, H., Emoto, N., Yamada, Y., … Tatsumi, K. (2021). Multi-institutional prospective cohort study of patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with respiratory diseases. Circulation Journal, 85(4), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1253/CIRCJ.CJ-20-0939

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free