Care is not a tally sheet: rethinking the field of gender divisions of domestic labour with care-centric conceptual narratives

10Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article addresses two puzzles that are at the heart of the field of gender divisions of domestic labour. How is it that care concepts seldom appear in a field that is focused on unpaid care work? Why does the field focus on divisions rather than on relationships and relationalities? To address these puzzles, I interrogate some of the conceptual underpinnings in the field's dominant theories: social exchange and 'doing gender'. Through a weaving of Margaret Somers' historical sociology of concept formation and Nancy Fraser's historical mapping of capitalism, care and social reproduction, I aim to rethink and remake the field of gender divisions of domestic labour through care theories, especially feminist care ethics and care economies research. I argue that care concepts - which highlight relationalities, responsiveness and responsibilities - can radically re-orient how we approach the 'who' and 'what' questions of this field's long-standing central focus on 'who does what?'.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Doucet, A. (2023). Care is not a tally sheet: rethinking the field of gender divisions of domestic labour with care-centric conceptual narratives. Families, Relationships and Societies, 12(1), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674322X16711124907533

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free