Happy photocatalysts and unhappy photocatalysts: electron trap-distribution analysis for metal oxide-sample identification

15Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A strange story, including a new concept of identification of inorganic solid materials and of photocatalyst design, is told here. Why is it that solid materials have not been identified, while organic chemists are required to identify their organic compounds for publication of a report? What is the meaning of identification? Why is it almost impossible to identify inorganic solids? Is it possible to identify an inorganic solid by using a certain fingerprint? Can energy-resolved distribution of electron traps (ERDT) patterns be fingerprint of solid materials? What do ERDT/CBB (conduction-band bottom) patterns tell us about the photocatalytic activity of titania samples?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ohtani, B., & Takashima, M. (2022). Happy photocatalysts and unhappy photocatalysts: electron trap-distribution analysis for metal oxide-sample identification. Catalysis Science and Technology, 12(2), 354–359. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cy01955d

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free