That's an Order! How the Quest for Efficiency Is Transforming Judicial Cooperation in Europe

12Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Effective procedural arrangements allow courts to reconcile conflicting demands of timely justice and sound legal argument. In the context of the European Union, conflict between these demands emerged most acutely in the face of paralyzing delays in the preliminary reference procedure. It was partly solved by Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure. The provision allowed the European Court of Justice to dispose of repetitive and legally undemanding cases with a reasoned order in lieu of a judgment. This article analyses all published orders of the European Court of Justice to examine the use and the implications of Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure. It is the first article to do so. We find that the Court resorts to orders to save time and to halt repeated questions from the courts of a single Member State.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brekke, S. A., Naurin, D., Šadl, U., & López-Zurita, L. (2023). That’s an Order! How the Quest for Efficiency Is Transforming Judicial Cooperation in Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13346

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free