Fracture strength of teeth with access cavity preparation with operating microscope or on buccal surfaces

  • D’amico Y
  • Da Silva Neto U
  • Westphalen V
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The present study assessed the fracture strength of teeth subjected to endodontic access cavity preparation on buccal surfaces, or with the aid of operating microscopy when compared to the conventional technique. Material and methods: Sixty mandibular incisors were split into four groups (n=15): conventional access cavity preparation (CCP); conservative (C); buccal surface (BS); and control. The canals were prepared and filled and the cavities were restored. A static compressive strength test was conducted until crown fracture. The force data were compiled and assessed statistically. Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests were performed to assess normality, Levene’s test to assess variance homogeneity, the one-way ANOVA to compare fracture strength in the assessed groups. Tukey’s HSD test was used to determine whether the differences in the means were significant between the groups.Results: The experimental groups did not show any statistically significant differences in mean fracture strength (CCP = 585.65 N±107.64 N)(BS = 530.52 N±129.35 N) (C = 517.83 N±114.68 N). Conclusion: Therefore, the selection of surface or size of access cavity proposed did not influence the fracture strength of mandibular incisors when compared to conventional cavity preparation. KeywordsDental pulp cavity; Dental stress analysis; Root canal therapy.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

D’amico, Y. C., Da Silva Neto, U. X., Westphalen, V. P. D., Carneiro, E., & Kowalczuck, A. (2019). Fracture strength of teeth with access cavity preparation with operating microscope or on buccal surfaces. Brazilian Dental Science, 22(1), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2019.v22i1.1655

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

80%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free