On metrics and prioritization of investments in hardware security

6Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The security risks posed by electronics are numerous. There are typically a variety of risk-reducing countermeasures for a given system or across an enterprise. Each countermeasure is associated with both a level of risk reduction and its lifecycle costs. Given budgetary constraints, risk managers and systems engineers must determine what combinations of countermeasures cost-effectively maximize risk reduction, and what metrics best guide the investment process. In this paper, we seek to answer these questions through exploration of risk reduction metrics from the field of security economics, including the benefit/cost ratio, return on security investment (ROSI), expected benefit of information security (EBIS), and expected net benefit of information security (ENBIS). The results suggest that ratio-based metrics are not strongly correlated with risk reduction, while EBIS is equivalent to risk reduction and ENBIS is equal to risk reduction minus cost.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Collier, Z. A., Briglia, B., Finkelston, T., Manasco, M. C., Slutzky, D. L., & Lambert, J. H. (2023). On metrics and prioritization of investments in hardware security. Systems Engineering, 26(4), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21667

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free