Abstract
The Chilean bill that regulates abortion for three cases (Bulletin N° 9895-11) includes the possibility that health professionals may manifest their conscientious objection (CO) to perform this procedure. Due to the broad impact that the issue of CO had, the Ethics Department of the Chilean College of Physicians considered important to review this concept and its ethical and legal basis, especially in the field of sexual and reproductive health. In the present document, we define the practical limits of CO, both for the proper fulfillment of the medical profession obligations, and for the due respect and non-discrimination that the professional objector deserves. We analyze the denial of some health institutions to perform abortions if it is legalized, and we end with recommendations adjusted to the Chilean reality. Specifically, we recognize the right to conscientious objection that all physicians who directly participate in a professional act have. But we also recognize that physicians have ineludible obligations towards their patients, including the obligation to inform about the existence of this service, how to access to it and -as set out in our code of ethics- to ensure that another colleague will continue attending the patient.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Salas, S. P., Besio, M., Bórquez Estefó, G., Salinas, R. A., Valenzuela, C. Y., Micolich, C., … Misseroni Raddatz, A. (2016). El médico y la objeción de conciencia. opinión del departamento de ética del colegio médico de Chile A. G. Revista Medica de Chile, 144(3), 382–387. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872016000300015
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.