Virtual reality check: a comparison of virtual reality, screen-based, and real world settings as research methods for HRI

6Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To reduce costs and effort, experiments in human-robot interaction can be carried out in Virtual Reality (VR) or in screen-based (SB) formats. However, it is not well examined whether robots are perceived and experienced in the same way in VR and SB as they are in the physical world. This study addresses this topic in a between-subjects experiment, measuring trust and engagement of an interaction with a mobile service robot in a museum scenario. Measures were made in three different settings, either the real world, in VR or in a game-like SB and then compared with an ANOVA. The results indicate, that neither trust nor engagement differ dependent on the experimental setting. The results imply that both VR and SB are eligible ways to explore the interaction with a mobile service robot, if some peculiarities of each medium are taken into account.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Plomin, J., Schweidler, P., & Oehme, A. (2023). Virtual reality check: a comparison of virtual reality, screen-based, and real world settings as research methods for HRI. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1156715

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free