Trade intervention: Not a silver bullet to address environmental externalities in global aquaculture

46Citations
Citations of this article
130Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aquaculture has been the world's fastest growing food production technology in recent decades, and continued growth in aquaculture production is predicted. While creating economic opportunity, aquaculture is also a new way of using eco-systems, and there is substantial evidence that aquaculture creates negative environmental externalities. Although the most effective way to address these externalities may be improved governance, this approach is often difficult because most aquaculture production takes place in developing countries with limited management capacity. The fact that a large part of aquaculture production is traded motivates substantial interest in the use of trade measures to reduce environmental impacts. However, the wide variety of species, production practices, and governance systems present in aquaculture makes it unlikely that general trade measures will achieve environmental objectives. Rather, there is a real risk that trade measures will reduce economic opportunity, raise new equity concerns, and impinge on public health with little or no environmental impact.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Asche, F., Roheim, C. A., & Smith, M. D. (2016). Trade intervention: Not a silver bullet to address environmental externalities in global aquaculture. Marine Policy, 69, 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.06.021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free