Adherence to guidelines in gynecologic cancer surgery

16Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review the available evidence documenting the prognostic role of adherence to guidelines in gynecologic cancers. A systematic review of the PubMed database using "guideline," "adherence," and "cancer" was carried out on February 25, 2014. Two thousand one hundred twenty-three publications were identified. Only publications addressing the question of adherence to recommendations regarding surgical care and multidisciplinary management of gynecologic cancers were selected. Six studies were identified in endometrial cancer, 4 in ovarian cancer, and none in cervical cancer. Adoption of guidelines is an effective tool for disease control and must consequently be considered as a process measure of quality cancer care. It is urgent to develop reliable and reproducible tools to assess adherence to guidelines based on level 1 evidence in gynecologic cancer then to carry out investigations to document the prognostic impact of compliance with guidelines. The time has come to include adherence to guidelines in quality assurance programs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferron, G., Martinez, A., Gladieff, L., Mery, E., David, I., Delannes, M., … Querleu, D. (2014, November 1). Adherence to guidelines in gynecologic cancer surgery. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000284

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free