Cognitive frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

97Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis basing on the prospective cohort studies were conducted to explore the risk of all-cause mortality and dementia in cognitively frail older adults compared to robust older adults and to determine whether it was a predictor of adverse outcomes. Methods: Pubmed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases were searched to retrieve studies on adverse outcomes of cognitive frailty. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Stata 15.0 Software was used to perform the meta-analysis. The all-cause mortality and dementia were observed to be the primary outcomes, while the other data were considered as the secondary outcome. Results: A total of 14 studies were included in qualitative analysis and 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with low risk of bias and moderate to good methodological quality. The results showed that cognitive frailty in older people had a higher risk of all-cause mortality [HR = 1.93, 95%CI (1.67, 2.23), p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bu, Z. H., Huang, A. L., Xue, M. T., Li, Q. Y., Bai, Y. M., & Xu, G. H. (2021, January 1). Cognitive frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain and Behavior. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1926

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free